Home Your basket
• Free sorting task of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertical extended hemi cr...
   Price 5.50 €
• The value of fine-needle ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Transoral surgical treatm...
   Price 8.50 €
• Disorders of the sense of...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mandibular reconstruction...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Congenital nasal pyriform...
   Price 5.50 €
• Thyroid oncocytomas....
   Price 10.50 €
• Feasibility study of sept...
   Price 10.50 €
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €
• When to suspect a perilym...
   Price 10.50 €
• Characteristics of the co...
   Price 8.50 €
• Fungal infections of para...
   Price 8.50 €
• The use of speech therapy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Histology of the larynx....
   Price 8.50 €
• Vibration induced nystagm...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bronchogenic cyst of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Osteointegrated cranio-fa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic-assisted retro...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Genotype – phenotype corr...
   Price 8.50 €
• Acoustic analysis of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interstitial brachytherap...
   Price 8.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.00 €
• The value of the operatin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Advantages of combined th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fibrous dysplasia, a case...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic dacryocystorhi...
   Price 5.50 €
• The three-stage frontal f...
   Price 14.00 €
• The uses of computer-assi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ossicular reconstruction ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannomas of the neck. ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €
• A new tongue plate for us...
   Price 5.50 €
• Teratoma of the parotid g...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 348.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2005 o

OTOLOGY

Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid


Authors : M. Niewiarowicz, O. Stieler (Poznan)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,2:75-80.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The aim of investigations was to compare the perception of the pitch of tonal signals by patients using both the cochlear implant and hearing aid. Material and method: The subjective evaluation of the pitch of sound presented through classical acoustic amplification and perceived by the residual hearing was compared with the sound perceived as a result of an electric stimulation. The subjects were 6 patients aged 15-63 (mean 38), diagnosed with postlingual deafness. The comparison of the acoustic signal transmitted via the hearing aid (in the acoustic free field) with the electrical signal from stimulated electrode of the cochlear implant enabled to determine subjectively evaluated shift in the frequency domain. The tonotopic distribution according to the Greenwood’s model compared with the allocation of frequency determined on the basis of cochlear view was also investigated. Results and conclusion: The study has revealed significant differences in the perception of the pitch of sounds perceived through the acoustic stimulation via the hearing aid and the electric stimulation via the implant.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE