Home Your basket
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Assessing efficacy of voi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Proposition of adaptation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Recurrent mandibular amel...
   Price 12.50 €
• Vision preference in dyna...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical and histopatholo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Orbital Kimura’s disease:...
   Price 14.00 €
• Unsteadiness and drunkenn...
   Price 10.50 €
• The length of the piston ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Posterior cranial fossa a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Induction chemotherapy an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparative results of ty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Virtual audiovisual talki...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical anatomy of the n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Decompression surgery for...
   Price 8.50 €
• The supracricoid laryngec...
   Price 10.50 €
• Neck masses in children: ...
   Price 14.00 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Study of the predictive v...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reliability of CT-Scan in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tympanoplasty: Experience...
   Price 12.00 €
• A single appointment with...
   Price 8.50 €
• A new technique for the u...
   Price 5.50 €
• Karapandzic flap for reco...
   Price 10.50 €
• The neurotologic evaluati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid papillary microca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the efficie...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 285.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2012 o

PHONIATRICS

Prosodic features of computer-assisted presentations: A preliminary study


Authors : Robieux C, Révis J, Ghio A, Giovanni A. (Marseille, Aix en Provence)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,1:3-8.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Computer-assisted presentations (CAP) seem to be characterized by changes of rhythm and melody of speech, compared to spontaneous speech, in many cases with periods with rapid and excessively regular breaks interspersed with long pauses. Methods: We analyzed the prosody and especially the pace in the temporal organization of prominences (distribution of stress, articulatory speed, pause duration) in 37 inexperienced subjects in a CAP corresponding to an actual review of graduation. The results were compared with a presen­ta­tion without support (PWS) conducted immediately after the first. A jury had to propose a gradation of prosody (typical CAP, intermediate, non-typical). Accentual distribution was analyzed from a perceptual experiment. The articulatory speed and length of breaks were analyzed from the speech signal. Results: We found the main elements of prosodic style assumed in three-quarters of subjects. This style was characterized by a faster articulatory rate and a more regular and rhythmic breaks due to excessive elongation of silent pauses when changing view of the slide. Discussion: The assumption seems validated because the majority of subjects in our study are of particular prosodic rhythm (faster and more regular). Subjects with arche­typal prosody of CAP appear to be those whose speech follo­wed closely their slide presentation, which disrupted their com­mu­nication.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE