Home Your basket
• Why is allergic rhinitis ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Desmoplastic ameloblastom...
   Price 5.50 €
• Otoplasty: Special attent...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Therapeutic choices for c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Medicamentous toxic heari...
   Price 5.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.50 €
• Assessment of migraine re...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Therapeutic education of ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Management of a huge amel...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral and recurrent f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Anatomic evaluation of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice handicap evaluation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malt lymphoma of the orbi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical anatomy of the f...
   Price 10.50 €
• A rare tumor of the parap...
   Price 5.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Anatomy of the external a...
   Price 14.00 €
• Feasibility study of sept...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unsteadiness and drunkenn...
   Price 10.50 €
• Giant metastasis invading...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal tumours of the thre...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €
• Planned reconstruction af...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal involvement in Croh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of swallowing ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Inverted naso-sinus papil...
   Price 10.50 €
• The prevention of voice d...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 293.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2002 o

HEAD AND NECK SURGERY

Prognostic value of mandibular involvement in oral cavity cancers.


Authors : F. Tankéré, J. L. Golmard, B. Barry, C. Guedon, J. Depondt, P. Gehanno (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,1:7-12.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: the aim of the study was to determine, in a homogeneous population, the prognostic impact of mandibular involvement in oral cancers. Study design: retrospective study of 117 patients with T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity treated by surgery and radiotherapy in the ENT Department of Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital. All patients had histologically confirmed mandibular involvement. Patients with partial involvement of the mandible underwent rim mandibulectomy (RM) and those with extensive invasion underwent segmental mandibulectomy (SM). Methods: the local failure rate and the overall survival curves were calculated with respect to type of mandibulectomy. The causes of death were analysed. Results: the surgery was conservative in 55 cases (47 %) and segmental in 62 patients (53 %). The degree of mandibular involvement did not influence the local failure rate (29 % and 25 % in the RM and SM groups, respectively). On the other hand, it strongly influenced vital outcome, as five-year survival was only 25.4 % after segmental mandibulectomy, compared to 40 % after rim mandibulectomy. The metastases and the second primary tumors were more frequent in the SM group. Conclusion: the degree of mandibular invasion influenced the survival rate of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity but this difference is not due to local failure.


Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE