Home Your basket
• Middle ear barotraumas du...
   Price 8.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fungal infections of para...
   Price 8.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Eagle syndrom: A case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.50 €
• Importance of swallowing ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid pseudo-nodules: 3...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chronitis tonsillitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Investigations on the ton...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cosmetic radiofrequency...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• Giant pleomorphic adenoma...
   Price 5.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparative study using A...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reverse phonation: Pathol...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evolution of facial nerve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Therapeutic management of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Progressive cochleo-vesti...
   Price 5.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of a laryngeal mask d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Kikuchi's disease as the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €
• Total ossicular reconstru...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acinic cell carcinoma in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal cryptococcosis ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diffuse cervical cellulit...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of laryngeal sialo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatment of acute mastoi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic augmentation of...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 361.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2013 o

OTOLOGY

Cochlear implantation in older patients: Outcomes and comparisons


Authors : Rafferty A, Tapper L, Strachan D, Raine C. (Bradford)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,3:119-124.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: A review of adults receiving cochlear implants (CIs) at the Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service (YCIS) was performed to assess whether age affects use or outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 50 implanted and habilitated at the YCIS was undertaken. Outcome measures included quality of life (QoL) question­naires and speech perception tests: CUNY sentences and BKB sentences. Comparisons were made between patients implanted age 50 to 59 (A), 60 to 69 (B) and 70 and over (C). Patients with English as a second language and those implanted for less than 9 months were excluded. Data was analysed using a repeated measure regression model. Results: 80 adults were included; A, 31; B, 29; C, 20. Significant improvements were seen in speech perception scores in all groups from pre-implant to 3 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the 3 groups in any outcome measure. QoL scores overall showed increased independence and greater partici­pa­tion in social activities with all patients feeling their implant had been successful. Discussion: Increased life expectancy and availability of cochlear implants (CIs) has led to greater numbers of older patients being eligible for implantation. Our results show improved speech perception and QoL outcomes in all groups. The lack of statistically significant differences between age groups supports the benefits of CIs in the older population. Older age should not be a discriminating factor in candidacy for cochlear implantation and referral of older patients to implant centres should be encouraged.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE