Home Your basket
• Frontal sinus osteoma com...
   Price 5.50 €
• The uses of computer-assi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prevalence of sensineural...
   Price 14.00 €
• Two cases of primary mali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rare benin tumors of the ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The effects of treatments...
   Price 14.00 €
• Eye rings: Morphological ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prosodic features of comp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otomycosis due to Scopula...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interests of multimedia s...
   Price 10.50 €
• The place of anti-viral i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid oncocytomas....
   Price 10.50 €
• External otitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Decompression surgery for...
   Price 8.50 €
• Complete branchial cleft ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pathophysiology of choles...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical findings in pati...
   Price 12.00 €
• Lifting of the oval face ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cleft palate and otitis m...
   Price 10.50 €
• Neuroplasticity in the au...
   Price 10.50 €
• "Bamboo nodes" : a clinic...
   Price 8.50 €
• Abscess tonsillectomy for...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertical extended hemi cr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Training strategies of th...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sacrifice was an art: The...
   Price 8.50 €
• Congenital nasal pyriform...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cranial fasciitis of chil...
   Price 8.50 €
• Esthesioneuroblastoma....
   Price 5.50 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Neurofibromatosis Type1 r...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation and treatment ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Dynamic palatography: Dia...
   Price 12.50 €
• Surgical anatomy of the f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Validity of cervical ausc...
   Price 12.00 €

Total Order 316.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2012 o

PHONIATRICS

Prosodic features of computer-assisted presentations: A preliminary study


Authors : Robieux C, Révis J, Ghio A, Giovanni A. (Marseille, Aix en Provence)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,1:3-8.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Computer-assisted presentations (CAP) seem to be characterized by changes of rhythm and melody of speech, compared to spontaneous speech, in many cases with periods with rapid and excessively regular breaks interspersed with long pauses. Methods: We analyzed the prosody and especially the pace in the temporal organization of prominences (distribution of stress, articulatory speed, pause duration) in 37 inexperienced subjects in a CAP corresponding to an actual review of graduation. The results were compared with a presen­ta­tion without support (PWS) conducted immediately after the first. A jury had to propose a gradation of prosody (typical CAP, intermediate, non-typical). Accentual distribution was analyzed from a perceptual experiment. The articulatory speed and length of breaks were analyzed from the speech signal. Results: We found the main elements of prosodic style assumed in three-quarters of subjects. This style was characterized by a faster articulatory rate and a more regular and rhythmic breaks due to excessive elongation of silent pauses when changing view of the slide. Discussion: The assumption seems validated because the majority of subjects in our study are of particular prosodic rhythm (faster and more regular). Subjects with arche­typal prosody of CAP appear to be those whose speech follo­wed closely their slide presentation, which disrupted their com­mu­nication.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE