Home Your basket
• Antro choanal polyp in ch...
   Price 10.00 €
• Somatic tinnitus (review)...
   Price 12.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Description of complicati...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rhinitis and allergy test...
   Price 8.50 €
• Schwannomas of the neck. ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mastoid eosinophilic gran...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cephalic vein access for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Artistic anatomy of the n...
   Price 8.50 €
• Seven cases of inverted n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 5.50 €
• Usher type I syndrome in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Role of positron emission...
   Price 15.00 €
• Cottle's technique septop...
   Price 5.50 €
• Stuttering of the “Miror”...
   Price 5.50 €
• The Voice Handicap Index:...
   Price 10.50 €
• Delayed facial palsy afte...
   Price 8.50 €
• A schwannoma of the hypog...
   Price 8.50 €
• Mast cells in chronic inf...
   Price 10.50 €
• Preliminary experimental ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multiple intracranial epi...
   Price 14.00 €
• DROP ATTACKS revealed a ...
   Price 10.00 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ossiculoplasty with hydro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Thyroid pseudo-nodules: 3...
   Price 5.50 €
• Prognostic value of senti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid oncocytomas....
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 259.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2010 o

OTOLOGY

Advantages of combined therapies in cosmetic medicine for the treatment of face aging: botulinum toxin, fillers and mesotherapy


Authors : Louvrier C, Montalban A, Lietin B, Gabrillargues J, Gilain L, Mom T. (Clermont-Ferrand)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2010;131,3:193-197.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: To determine whether surgical pitfalls can be anticipated through a preoperative CT-Scan in case of middle ear implantation with a semi-implantable middle ear ossicular stimulator from Otologics® (SIMOS). A second outcome mea­su­re was to assess the auditory gain obtained in the series. Mate­rials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 19 consecu­tive surgical procedure for a SIMOS implantations was achie­ved. Preoperative Ct-Scans were analyzed and several measu­re­ments of the mastoid were taken out from axial trans­verse views, ie. the distance between the incus and the cortical mas­toid bone [d(i-c)], the distance between the sigmoid sinus and the incus [d(i-ss)], the distance between the sigmoid sinus and the cortical bone of the mastoid [d(c’-ss)]. On coronal images, the dura of the middle fossa was described as procident if it was lower than the head of malleus and/or body incus. Auditory gain was calculated on pure tone and speech audio­metry with bisyllabic words. Results: All cases were success­fully implan­ted. d(i-c) was on average at 33.1±2.6 mm in cases easy to implant. One case of contracted mastoid was difficult and led to the impaction of the sigmoid sinus. In this case the distance d(i-c) was shorter at 25 mm than the average minus 2 standard deviations of the others (27.9 mm). Also d(ss-c’) was lower at 7 mm than the average minus 2 standard deviations of the others (7.6 mm). Two other cases led to difficult surgical proce­du­res because of a low middle fossa dura. This too low middle fossa dura could be identified on preoperative coronal CT-scans in these two cases. Audiometric gains were remarka­ble, with an average of 39±16 dB. In case of severe senso­rineural hea­ring loss the average gain was higher at 46±9 dB. Two revision-pro­ce­dures were required, one for a device failure, the second because of skin alteration due to systemic inflammatory disease requiring corticosteroids. Mean follow-up was 50±22 months. Conclusion: The SIMOS is a powerful middle ear implant that can undoubtedly give a huge audiometric gain. The implan­tation procedure requires a precise microsurgical operation that can be hampered by anatomical conditions of the petrous bone. A thorough examination of preoperative CT-scan is highly recommended in order to obtain measurements of the mastoid in axial views, and the analysis of the position of the middle fossa dura in coronal views.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE