Home Your basket
• Parathyroid carcinoma: di...
   Price 5.50 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• The «neurological» velum ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Balance disorders in the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Blepharoplasty and upper ...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• A clinico-radiological st...
   Price 10.50 €
• Type III ossiculoplasty w...
   Price 5.50 €
• High click stimulus repet...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early ENT manifestations ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inferior turbinate hypert...
   Price 10.50 €
• New indications for heari...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of the use of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A rare and unusual cause ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The frontal pneumosinus d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Observational study to as...
   Price 14.00 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Validity of cervical ausc...
   Price 12.00 €
• The expanding domain of i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Apology for the biplane c...
   Price 10.50 €
• The prevention of voice d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi-Fujimoto’s diseas...
   Price 10.50 €
• How to predict post thyro...
   Price 12.00 €
• Diffuse cervical cellulit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid papillary microca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Technique of upper blepha...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side-to-end hypoglossal-f...
   Price 10.50 €
• A new case of rhinosclero...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Functional comparison of ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Electrorhinomanometric ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• MIF in Head and Neck canc...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 345.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2005 o

OTOLOGY

Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid


Authors : M. Niewiarowicz, O. Stieler (Poznan)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,2:75-80.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The aim of investigations was to compare the perception of the pitch of tonal signals by patients using both the cochlear implant and hearing aid. Material and method: The subjective evaluation of the pitch of sound presented through classical acoustic amplification and perceived by the residual hearing was compared with the sound perceived as a result of an electric stimulation. The subjects were 6 patients aged 15-63 (mean 38), diagnosed with postlingual deafness. The comparison of the acoustic signal transmitted via the hearing aid (in the acoustic free field) with the electrical signal from stimulated electrode of the cochlear implant enabled to determine subjectively evaluated shift in the frequency domain. The tonotopic distribution according to the Greenwood’s model compared with the allocation of frequency determined on the basis of cochlear view was also investigated. Results and conclusion: The study has revealed significant differences in the perception of the pitch of sounds perceived through the acoustic stimulation via the hearing aid and the electric stimulation via the implant.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE