Home Your basket
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis: a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Inflammatory pathology an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment by enlargement ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment of severe epist...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• Hypersensitivity to inhal...
   Price 10.50 €
• The relevance of Choukrou...
   Price 10.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €
• Modern lipostructure: The...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial hearing recovery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A rare case of sarcoidosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Callas or the trajectory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Amphicrine adenoma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Today’s importance of ult...
   Price 14.00 €
• Rhinolithiasis: Review ab...
   Price 5.50 €
• The Voice Handicap Index:...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical and pharyngeal i...
   Price 5.50 €
• Surgical findings in pati...
   Price 12.00 €
• Silent Sinus Syndrome – T...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vestibular neuritis: aeti...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannomas...
   Price 5.50 €
• Side-to-end hypoglossal-f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertical extended hemi cr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Psychosocial quality of l...
   Price 10.50 €
• Invasive cholesteatoma in...
   Price 10.50 €
• Objective tinnitus and es...
   Price 5.50 €
• Parathyroïd adenoma induc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vestibular dysfunction af...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical liposuction: A r...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic neuroma surgery....
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life after oro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Difficult blepharoplastie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dysphonia and cervical hy...
   Price 5.50 €
• Characteristics of the ma...
   Price 12.50 €
• Otologic surgery in HIV-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• One-stage surgery of midd...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life after rad...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 8.50 €
• High click stimulus repet...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 405.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2005 o

OTOLOGY

Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid


Authors : M. Niewiarowicz, O. Stieler (Poznan)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,2:75-80.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The aim of investigations was to compare the perception of the pitch of tonal signals by patients using both the cochlear implant and hearing aid. Material and method: The subjective evaluation of the pitch of sound presented through classical acoustic amplification and perceived by the residual hearing was compared with the sound perceived as a result of an electric stimulation. The subjects were 6 patients aged 15-63 (mean 38), diagnosed with postlingual deafness. The comparison of the acoustic signal transmitted via the hearing aid (in the acoustic free field) with the electrical signal from stimulated electrode of the cochlear implant enabled to determine subjectively evaluated shift in the frequency domain. The tonotopic distribution according to the Greenwood’s model compared with the allocation of frequency determined on the basis of cochlear view was also investigated. Results and conclusion: The study has revealed significant differences in the perception of the pitch of sounds perceived through the acoustic stimulation via the hearing aid and the electric stimulation via the implant.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE