Home Your basket
• Management of swallowing ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Apology for the biplane c...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Failure to regain full fu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial nerve monitoring i...
   Price 10.50 €
• The «intra-cordal polyp»:...
   Price 5.50 €
• From intelligibility to c...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paediatric airway endosco...
   Price 5.50 €
• Quality of life evaluatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical management of ma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal polyposis: long ter...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi-Fujimoto’s diseas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ruptured pexis after supr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The clinical significance...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endovascular treatment of...
   Price 12.00 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis: a...
   Price 8.50 €
• A comparative acoustic st...
   Price 5.50 €
• A simple assessment of qu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otologic surgery in HIV-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• A non-linear model of lar...
   Price 10.50 €
• Immunohistochemistry expr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparative results of ty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of the cervical ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Chondrosarcoma of the hyo...
   Price 12.50 €
• Chronic laryngitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Lysis of the incus long p...
   Price 10.50 €
• The lymphoepithelial carc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Migraine, neurone and ves...
   Price 5.50 €
• A case of laryngeal sialo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Allergic rhinitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Peritonsillar abscess: Is...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life before an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Value of the preservation...
   Price 14.00 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation of the handica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Exploration of the otolit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Minimising radiation dose...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of peritonsill...
   Price 5.50 €
• Airbag and hearing loss: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prognostic value of mandi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perceptual assessment of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acute rhinosinusitis in a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vibrant Soundbridge middl...
   Price 10.50 €
• The place of anti-viral i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Free sorting task of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Migrating hypopharyngeal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vascular tumors of the n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice after supracricoid ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Audit of headache followi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cowden syndrome: Otolaryn...
   Price 12.00 €
• Callas or the trajectory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Paediatric endoscopic sin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi Fujimoto, one cas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Actinomycosis of the midd...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparison of three diffe...
   Price 12.00 €
• Autologous cartilaginous ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistula of the fourth bra...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 565.00 €

contents

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2006 o

RHINOLOGY

Comparison of radical (nasalisation) and functional ethmoidectomy in patients with severe sinonasal polyposis. A retrospective study


Authors : R. Jankowski, D. Pigret, F. Decroocq, A. Blum, P. Gillet (Nancy)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2006;127,3:131-140.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: To compare the 5-year outcomes of two endoscopic surgical approaches for diffuse and severe nasal polyposis. Study design: A natural experimental situation gave us the opportunity to compare the results 5 years after radical ethmoidectomy (nasalisation) (n= 39), and functional ethmoidectomy (n= 37). The two surgical procedures were performed by two different surgeons on 76 consecutive patients. There was no random assignment for this retrospective study. Methods: Five years after surgery, the criteria for comparison were 1) functional results based on a questionnaire using visual analogue scales in patients free of revision surgery; 2) endoscopic and CT-scan assessments of anatomical results. The CT-scans were blinded and randomized, and opacities were measured using a computerized model; 3) the recurrence rate of nasal polyps. Results: Five years after surgery, the overall nasal functional benefit was scored 8.41 ± 0.40 (mean ± SEM) after nasalisation, and 5.69 ± 0.83 after ethmoidectomy P= 0.002) in patients free of revision surgery. The endoscopic appearance of the mucosa was methodically scored according to a pre-defined scale. Results were significantly better in the nasalisation group (6.03 ± 0.7 versus 3.27 ± 1.0, P= 0.02). A good correlation was found between the endoscopic and CT-scan scores (r= -0.78, P= 0.0001 for nasalisation, and r= -0.65, P= 0.001 for ethmoidectomy). The total recurrence rate was 22.7% in the nasalisation group, and 58.3% in the ethmoidectomy group (c2= 10.41, P< 0.01). Conclusion: Our study suggests that in the treatment of nasal polyposis complete ethmoidectomy leads to better long term results than incomplete ethmoidectomy.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE