Home Your basket
• Fungal sinusitis: Report ...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mycobacterial cervical ly...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of peri-operativ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Induction chemotherapy an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic parotidectomy: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Electrorhinomanometric ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cephalic vein access for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perceptual assessment of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Gastro-oesophageal reflux...
   Price 8.50 €
• Migrating esophageal fore...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Artistic anatomy of the n...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vertical extended hemi cr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Active bone conduction im...
   Price 12.00 €
• Exophthalmos arising from...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autologous bone pate in m...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Eye rings: Morphological ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otologic surgery in HIV-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Research in cancer : adva...
   Price 5.50 €
• Signs of upper Airways di...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evolution of facial nerve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical exploration of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• External versus endoscopi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Vestibular neuritis: aeti...
   Price 8.50 €
• Proposal of a rating scal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of instrumental vocal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Anatomic evaluation of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve pa...
   Price 5.50 €
• The monaural pseudo-stere...
   Price 8.50 €
• Functional comparison of ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Long term results of tymp...
   Price 5.50 €
• Delayed facial palsy afte...
   Price 8.50 €
• Schwannomas of the neck. ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The relevance of Choukrou...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inverted naso-sinus papil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Toxic nodular goitre asso...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 352.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2000 o

LARYNGOLOGY

Pharyngeal pouch surgery : a five year review


Authors : M. A. Siddiq, P. J. Patel (Walsall)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2000;121,1:37-40.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : The treatment of pharyngeal pouch varies widely. Our aim was to establish current and recent practice in pharyngeal pouch surgery in our department and set guidelines for future management. A retrospective audit over a 5-year period was performed with all data derived from patient notes. 28 procedures were performed on 24 patients with a mean age of 72 years. Over two thirds of these patients (68%) underwent an endoscopic procedure (stapling or diathermy) and the remainder underwent excision (14%), inversion (10%), cricopharyngeal myotomy (4%) or dilatation (4%). The primary diagnostic investigation performed was a barium swallow in 17 cases, but in 7 cases, referred by gastroenterologists, an oesophagogastroscopy was performed despite characteristic presenting features in all cases. The average inpatient stay was similar for endoscopic and excision procedures (5.5 and 5 days respectively), but longer for inversion procedures (9 days). This was influenced mainly by operative complications. 2 endoscopic stapling procedures were complicated by perforations and 1 patient developed hoarseness after an inversion procedure. The mean follow up time was one month at which stage all asymptomatic patients were discharged. 2 patients treated by endoscopic stapling and 1 patient treated by inversion complained of persistent symptoms and required further surgery. We conclude that endoscopic stapling was the commonest procedure used. Concerning future management, the use of nasogastric tubes after uncomplicated stapling procedures was abandoned. Also it was felt that large pouches should be treated by excision, small pouches by cricopharyngeal myotomy and the remainder by endoscopic stapling. The long-term evaluation of results was also deemed necessary.

Price : 5.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE