Home Your basket
• Late metastasis from rena...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of a huge amel...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic sphenoid proce...
   Price 8.50 €
• "Bamboo nodes" : a clinic...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• Different clinical approa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chondrosarcoma of the hyo...
   Price 12.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• High click stimulus repet...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sarcomatoid carcinomas of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multiple intracranial epi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bronchogenic cyst of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• New indications for heari...
   Price 8.50 €
• Advantages of combined th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Percutaneous gastrostomy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Alternative clinical mana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Iatrogenic scarring of th...
   Price 12.00 €
• Sentinel lymph node biops...
   Price 15.00 €
• Inferior turbinate hypert...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnostic value of vibra...
   Price 8.50 €
• The effects of treatments...
   Price 14.00 €
• Eagle syndrom: A case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Eye rings: Morphological ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 10.50 €
• Assessment of migraine re...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cosmetic radiofrequency...
   Price 10.50 €
• Value of the preservation...
   Price 14.00 €
• Combined transoral and su...
   Price 10.50 €
• When to suspect a perilym...
   Price 10.50 €
• Technique of upper blepha...
   Price 10.50 €
• Atelectasis of the maxill...
   Price 8.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Extraction of the esophag...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Defects in accuracy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• Adolescence and cochlear ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Anatomic evaluation of th...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 390.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2013 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

Aesthetic augmentation of the dorsum, mid-term results


Authors : Winter C, Gerbault O, Kestemont P, Castillo L. (Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,4:179-184.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Purpose of the study: Dorsum aesthetic augmentation can be divided according to their objective, total and partial increa­se or camouflage. The objective of this original article is to define the valid techniques in each indication through a cohort study, clinical cases, and current data from the lite­ra­ture. Patient and method: lt is a monocentric mono operator retrospec­tive study from 2005 to 2010 included. On 171 rhino­plasties, 57 were augmentation rhinoplasties of which 40 were of interest to the dorsum. Excluded patients were bone grafts, lost and one patient operated on a active Wegener desease. Thus 26 rhinoplasties were analyzed by an indepen­dent obser­ver. Results: All grafts confused there were 11.5% of resorption which corresponds to the data from the literature, 17% of resorption in the camouflage indications and 7% in augmen­ta­tion, as well as a higher resorption for crushed cartilage (33%) rate. There was more mobility in augmentation (28%) than in the camouflage (8%) and greater visibility of the banks of the graft in augmentation (35%) compared to the camouflage (8%). Conclusion: In the mild to severe saddle nose, the DCF is greater than cartilage monobloc or crushed in terms of stability and visibility, its indications could be expanded to harmoni­sa­tion. Camouflage crushed cartilage is not sustainable and the temporal aponeurosis could it be preferred. Resorbable fillers can offer an alternative to surgery or improve its results.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE