Home Your basket
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Glomangioma or "glomic tu...
   Price 5.50 €
• "Endolymphatic" cochleo-v...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mastoid eosinophilic gran...
   Price 5.50 €
• Efficacy and safety of mo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Malignant melanoma of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi Fujimoto, one cas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison of stapes prot...
   Price 15.00 €
• Vertebro and cranio veino...
   Price 14.00 €
• Rhinophyma in a black afr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal dystonia and as...
   Price 8.50 €
• Analysis of the projectio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant mixed tumor of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €
• The expanding domain of i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malt lymphoma of the orbi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Traditional and emerging ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Farber's disease: a cause...
   Price 5.50 €
• Aspects of ageing on prof...
   Price 12.00 €
• Central and peripherical ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A rare and unusual cause ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Plastic surgery indicatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• How to take a mastoid and...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 268.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2002 o

AUDIOLOGY

Usefulness and limitations of speech audiometric testing in the detection of professional nose-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting.


Authors : E. Babin, A. Bequignon, M. Goullet de Rugy, E. Edy, S. Moreau, J. P. Izard, A. Valdazo (Caen)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,4:213-217.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: the objective of this study is the evaluation of the calculation of 100% intelligibility threshold and noise resistance index as a monitoring test in populations exposed to noise in their work environment. Method: this is a retrospective exposed-unexposed study as the exposure to the risk factors took place before the survey. The exposed subjects were chosen in principle on sonometric criteria and the unexposed subjects among employees whom we believe were not exposed. The exploration method included history taking, clinical examination, free field audiometry and speech audiometry with background noise. Results: the exposed population has a 100% intelligibility threshold on average equal to 29.69 dB, significantly higher than in the unexposed population where it is calculated at 25.30 dB (p=0.07). The noise resistance index varies with age (p=0.04). Conclusion: our study shows the existence of a significant hearing difference between two populations with different noise exposure. It demonstrates a relationship between a hearing loss risk factor such as noise and the occurrence of the "professional hearing loss" disorder. The calculation of the 100% intelligibility index and the noise resistance index advantageously complements tonal audiometry. These procedures provide a better approach to the social impact of hearing loss but were not useful in the detection of hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE