Home Your basket
• Psychosocial quality of l...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of a dysphonic...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otomycosis...
   Price 10.50 €
• The effectiveness of voic...
   Price 14.00 €
• CT scanning in "second lo...
   Price 5.50 €
• Central auditory processi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pott’s puffy tumour, rare...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hyperglycemia after intra...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatment of severe epist...
   Price 5.50 €
• Otomycosis: Clinical and ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Positioning in the oropha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Botulinum toxin and rejuv...
   Price 10.50 €
• Revision ossiculoplasty: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Phonatory threshold press...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment failures in ben...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pure sensorineural hearin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Proposal of a rating scal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arachnoid granulations of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution of endoscopi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Facial dissection applied...
   Price 14.00 €
• Develop­ment of an osteos...
   Price 8.50 €
• Lateral semicircular cana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction after tumo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannomas...
   Price 5.50 €
• Transverse maxillary defi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 5.50 €
• BAHA in single sided deaf...
   Price 12.50 €
• Chronitis tonsillitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Implication of mitochondr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Free sorting task of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Interstitial brachytherap...
   Price 8.50 €
• Characteristics of the co...
   Price 8.50 €
• Possible role of biofilm ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prognostic value of senti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral abductor vocal ...
   Price 14.00 €

Total Order 381.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2000 o

LARYNGOLOGY

Pharyngeal pouch surgery : a five year review


Authors : M. A. Siddiq, P. J. Patel (Walsall)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2000;121,1:37-40.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : The treatment of pharyngeal pouch varies widely. Our aim was to establish current and recent practice in pharyngeal pouch surgery in our department and set guidelines for future management. A retrospective audit over a 5-year period was performed with all data derived from patient notes. 28 procedures were performed on 24 patients with a mean age of 72 years. Over two thirds of these patients (68%) underwent an endoscopic procedure (stapling or diathermy) and the remainder underwent excision (14%), inversion (10%), cricopharyngeal myotomy (4%) or dilatation (4%). The primary diagnostic investigation performed was a barium swallow in 17 cases, but in 7 cases, referred by gastroenterologists, an oesophagogastroscopy was performed despite characteristic presenting features in all cases. The average inpatient stay was similar for endoscopic and excision procedures (5.5 and 5 days respectively), but longer for inversion procedures (9 days). This was influenced mainly by operative complications. 2 endoscopic stapling procedures were complicated by perforations and 1 patient developed hoarseness after an inversion procedure. The mean follow up time was one month at which stage all asymptomatic patients were discharged. 2 patients treated by endoscopic stapling and 1 patient treated by inversion complained of persistent symptoms and required further surgery. We conclude that endoscopic stapling was the commonest procedure used. Concerning future management, the use of nasogastric tubes after uncomplicated stapling procedures was abandoned. Also it was felt that large pouches should be treated by excision, small pouches by cricopharyngeal myotomy and the remainder by endoscopic stapling. The long-term evaluation of results was also deemed necessary.

Price : 5.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE