Home Your basket
• Impaired laryngeal mobili...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pseudoaneurysm of the int...
   Price 5.50 €
• Validation of a clinical ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Idiopathic sudden deafnes...
   Price 10.50 €
• A giant lipoma of parapha...
   Price 8.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post intubation collected...
   Price 8.50 €
• Study on the modeling of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cochlear implants in chil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical procedure in fir...
   Price 8.50 €
• Multidisciplinary daytime...
   Price 12.00 €
• Pneumoparotid: a case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post-traumatic otoscleros...
   Price 8.50 €
• A rare tumor of the parap...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral vestibular loss...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inverted naso-sinus papil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison of stapes prot...
   Price 15.00 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The neurotologic evaluati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Balloon catheter dilatati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Brain stem cavernous angi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparison of radical (na...
   Price 10.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• TRT: Results after one ye...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of laryngeal sialo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reliability of CT-Scan in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• An unusual case of intrat...
   Price 5.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal involvement in Croh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pure sensorineural hearin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Total pharyngolayngectomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otomycosis due to Scopula...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 331.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2013 o

OTOLOGY

Cochlear implantation in older patients: Outcomes and comparisons


Authors : Rafferty A, Tapper L, Strachan D, Raine C. (Bradford)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,3:119-124.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: A review of adults receiving cochlear implants (CIs) at the Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service (YCIS) was performed to assess whether age affects use or outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 50 implanted and habilitated at the YCIS was undertaken. Outcome measures included quality of life (QoL) question­naires and speech perception tests: CUNY sentences and BKB sentences. Comparisons were made between patients implanted age 50 to 59 (A), 60 to 69 (B) and 70 and over (C). Patients with English as a second language and those implanted for less than 9 months were excluded. Data was analysed using a repeated measure regression model. Results: 80 adults were included; A, 31; B, 29; C, 20. Significant improvements were seen in speech perception scores in all groups from pre-implant to 3 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the 3 groups in any outcome measure. QoL scores overall showed increased independence and greater partici­pa­tion in social activities with all patients feeling their implant had been successful. Discussion: Increased life expectancy and availability of cochlear implants (CIs) has led to greater numbers of older patients being eligible for implantation. Our results show improved speech perception and QoL outcomes in all groups. The lack of statistically significant differences between age groups supports the benefits of CIs in the older population. Older age should not be a discriminating factor in candidacy for cochlear implantation and referral of older patients to implant centres should be encouraged.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE