Home Your basket
• Middle ear barotraumas du...
   Price 8.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fungal infections of para...
   Price 8.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Eagle syndrom: A case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.50 €
• Importance of swallowing ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid pseudo-nodules: 3...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chronitis tonsillitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Investigations on the ton...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cosmetic radiofrequency...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• Giant pleomorphic adenoma...
   Price 5.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparative study using A...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reverse phonation: Pathol...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evolution of facial nerve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Therapeutic management of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Progressive cochleo-vesti...
   Price 5.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of a laryngeal mask d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Kikuchi's disease as the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €
• Total ossicular reconstru...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acinic cell carcinoma in ...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 280.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2010 o

OTOLOGY

Advantages of combined therapies in cosmetic medicine for the treatment of face aging: botulinum toxin, fillers and mesotherapy


Authors : Louvrier C, Montalban A, Lietin B, Gabrillargues J, Gilain L, Mom T. (Clermont-Ferrand)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2010;131,3:193-197.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: To determine whether surgical pitfalls can be anticipated through a preoperative CT-Scan in case of middle ear implantation with a semi-implantable middle ear ossicular stimulator from Otologics® (SIMOS). A second outcome mea­su­re was to assess the auditory gain obtained in the series. Mate­rials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 19 consecu­tive surgical procedure for a SIMOS implantations was achie­ved. Preoperative Ct-Scans were analyzed and several measu­re­ments of the mastoid were taken out from axial trans­verse views, ie. the distance between the incus and the cortical mas­toid bone [d(i-c)], the distance between the sigmoid sinus and the incus [d(i-ss)], the distance between the sigmoid sinus and the cortical bone of the mastoid [d(c’-ss)]. On coronal images, the dura of the middle fossa was described as procident if it was lower than the head of malleus and/or body incus. Auditory gain was calculated on pure tone and speech audio­metry with bisyllabic words. Results: All cases were success­fully implan­ted. d(i-c) was on average at 33.1±2.6 mm in cases easy to implant. One case of contracted mastoid was difficult and led to the impaction of the sigmoid sinus. In this case the distance d(i-c) was shorter at 25 mm than the average minus 2 standard deviations of the others (27.9 mm). Also d(ss-c’) was lower at 7 mm than the average minus 2 standard deviations of the others (7.6 mm). Two other cases led to difficult surgical proce­du­res because of a low middle fossa dura. This too low middle fossa dura could be identified on preoperative coronal CT-scans in these two cases. Audiometric gains were remarka­ble, with an average of 39±16 dB. In case of severe senso­rineural hea­ring loss the average gain was higher at 46±9 dB. Two revision-pro­ce­dures were required, one for a device failure, the second because of skin alteration due to systemic inflammatory disease requiring corticosteroids. Mean follow-up was 50±22 months. Conclusion: The SIMOS is a powerful middle ear implant that can undoubtedly give a huge audiometric gain. The implan­tation procedure requires a precise microsurgical operation that can be hampered by anatomical conditions of the petrous bone. A thorough examination of preoperative CT-scan is highly recommended in order to obtain measurements of the mastoid in axial views, and the analysis of the position of the middle fossa dura in coronal views.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE