Home Your basket
• Why is allergic rhinitis ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Desmoplastic ameloblastom...
   Price 5.50 €
• Otoplasty: Special attent...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Therapeutic choices for c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Medicamentous toxic heari...
   Price 5.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.50 €
• Assessment of migraine re...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Therapeutic education of ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Management of a huge amel...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral and recurrent f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Anatomic evaluation of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice handicap evaluation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malt lymphoma of the orbi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical anatomy of the f...
   Price 10.50 €
• A rare tumor of the parap...
   Price 5.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Anatomy of the external a...
   Price 14.00 €
• Feasibility study of sept...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unsteadiness and drunkenn...
   Price 10.50 €
• Giant metastasis invading...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal tumours of the thre...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €
• Planned reconstruction af...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal involvement in Croh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of swallowing ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Inverted naso-sinus papil...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 282.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2007 o

PHONIATRICS

Quality of life evaluation after total laryngectomy: Interests and limits in speech therapy


Authors : Delahaye R, Tessier Ch. (Paris, Rennes)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2007;128,5:321-324.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: In order to improve the speech therapy process after total laryngectomy (TL), an "ecological" approach of the rehabilitation of the TL has been used to adapt our technique to the appropriate situation of each patient (according to his expectations, his needs, etc…), and therefore to ensure the success of the training of an substitution voice. Methods: patients were evaluated with auto-evaluation scales: EORTC QLQ C30 dealing with common aspects affecting all patients with cancer, EORTC QLQ H&N 35 dealing with characteristics more particular of cancers of head and neck and a scale of vocal handicap (VHI) to be able to compare quality of life and felt vocal handicap. We completed this study by a perceptive evaluation with the I(I)NFVo scale corresponding to the GRBAS for non-laryngeal voices. Population: 37 subjects, 31 men (84 %), 6 women (16 %). average age: 60 years. 9 subjects implanted with a tracheo-oesophageal prosthesis (24 %). Average post-operative period: 5 years. Results: The quality of life among patients with TL is relatively well preserved, the principal complaint being in the social field. Neither the age, the sex, the post-operative period, nor the use of a tracheo-oesophageal voice (TOV) instead of an oro-oesophageal voice (OOV) seem to have an influence on the quality of life of the questioned patients. The results with the VHI show that only the post-operative period influences the vocal handicap. As for the perceptive analysis, only the post-operative period and the use of the TOV influence the scores. Conclusion: This study enabled us to note the absence of correlation between the quality of life, the vocal handicap, and the perceptive quality of the non-laryngeal voice. These scales are complementary tools and can constitute an invaluable help in the treatment of the TL thanks to simple methods (self-evaluation), which are standardized, reproducible, with an aim of assessment at the beginning or at the end of treatment, or to control and follow-up.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE