Home Your basket
• Functional comparison of ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Medicamentous toxic heari...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal sarcoidosis: Ca...
   Price 5.50 €
• Complete branchial cleft ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Primary nasal tuberculosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• The verrucous laryngeal c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesterol granuloma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interstitial brachytherap...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evolution of the otology ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chondrocalcinosis of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The outcome of treatments...
   Price 10.50 €
• A clinical respiratory ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rare benin tumors of the ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pyogenic granuloma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• A histopathologic evaluat...
   Price 8.50 €
• Migrant foreign body of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical management of pa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Retrosigmoid vestibular n...
   Price 5.50 €
• Disability in patients wi...
   Price 10.50 €
• CT scan, MR imaging and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Implication of mitochondr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic augmentation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Life after total laryngec...
   Price 8.50 €
• Choanal atresia: therapeu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Smile "forced" smile vers...
   Price 10.50 €
• The prevention of voice d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diffuse cervical cellulit...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• Overlay versus underlay t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Difficult blepharoplastie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early PTH assay after tot...
   Price 10.50 €
• Determination of oesophag...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 328.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2013 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

Aesthetic augmentation of the dorsum, mid-term results


Authors : Winter C, Gerbault O, Kestemont P, Castillo L. (Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,4:179-184.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Purpose of the study: Dorsum aesthetic augmentation can be divided according to their objective, total and partial increa­se or camouflage. The objective of this original article is to define the valid techniques in each indication through a cohort study, clinical cases, and current data from the lite­ra­ture. Patient and method: lt is a monocentric mono operator retrospec­tive study from 2005 to 2010 included. On 171 rhino­plasties, 57 were augmentation rhinoplasties of which 40 were of interest to the dorsum. Excluded patients were bone grafts, lost and one patient operated on a active Wegener desease. Thus 26 rhinoplasties were analyzed by an indepen­dent obser­ver. Results: All grafts confused there were 11.5% of resorption which corresponds to the data from the literature, 17% of resorption in the camouflage indications and 7% in augmen­ta­tion, as well as a higher resorption for crushed cartilage (33%) rate. There was more mobility in augmentation (28%) than in the camouflage (8%) and greater visibility of the banks of the graft in augmentation (35%) compared to the camouflage (8%). Conclusion: In the mild to severe saddle nose, the DCF is greater than cartilage monobloc or crushed in terms of stability and visibility, its indications could be expanded to harmoni­sa­tion. Camouflage crushed cartilage is not sustainable and the temporal aponeurosis could it be preferred. Resorbable fillers can offer an alternative to surgery or improve its results.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE