Home Your basket
• Facial nerve monitoring i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesteatoma behind a no...
   Price 10.50 €
• Correlation between laryn...
   Price 10.50 €
• The neurotologic evaluati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertigo: progress and pra...
   Price 8.50 €
• Therapeutic choices for c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Migraine, neurone and ves...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vocal forcing and posture...
   Price 10.50 €
• Middle ear adenoma / carc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cervico facial lymphangio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment and rehabilitat...
   Price 10.50 €
• Lateral fixation of the v...
   Price 8.50 €
• Otogenic pneumocephalus: ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Audiological comparison b...
   Price 14.00 €
• Paediatric endoscopic sin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Merkel cell carcinoma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic melanoma to th...
   Price 5.50 €
• A new look on septoplasti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical signs and correl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Congenital bilateral choa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Early ENT manifestations ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution of clinical ...
   Price 14.00 €
• How I do it: Salivary duc...
   Price 8.50 €
• A simple assessment of qu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Which face lift for which...
   Price 14.00 €
• Pathophysiology of choles...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical Practice Guideli...
   Price 12.00 €
• Efficacy of voice therapy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Develop­ment of an osteos...
   Price 8.50 €
• Role of positron emission...
   Price 15.00 €
• Prosody and reading: Temp...
   Price 12.00 €

Total Order 326.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2011 o

OTONEUROLOGY

Cochlear implant in elderly: Performance outcomes in the long term


Authors : Marx M, Gutierrez D, Lepage B, Khoury E, Laborde m-l, Deguine O, Fraysse B. (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,4:187-191.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: To study and compare the evolving capacities of speech discrimination with cochlear implants in older patients compared to patients implanted at a younger age. Metho­dology: A retrospective study comparing a group of 52 patients aged over 65 with a control group of 58 patients aged between 30 and 50 years, followed for 5 years after implantation. We analyzed and compared the evolution of speech discrimination in silence (disyllabic words, sentences) and noise (sentences, S/N ratio: +10 dB) after implantation. Results: In the group of elderly patients, the speech discrimi­na­tion in silence remains stable over time (for disyllabic words, score at 6 months: 72.8 ± 20.2%; score at 5 years: 73.7% ± 19.7). Discrimination in noise tends to improve (mean score at 6 months: 70.5% ± 21.5; score at 5 years: 76.9% ± 16.9). The results obtained are in silence are compa­ra­ble to the results of the group of patients aged between 30 and 50. In noise, their performance remains lower than the control group (mean differences between scores: -10.8; confidence interval at 95%: -17.9, -5.3). Conclusion: The cochlear implant is effective over the long term in elderly patients, for speech discrimination in quiet and in noise. In silence, their perfor­mance is comparable to younger patients with implants.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE