Home Your basket
• Congenital bilateral choa...
   Price 5.50 €
• The value of fine-needle ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cemento-ossifying fibroma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Granular cell tumours (Ab...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatment of severe epist...
   Price 5.50 €
• Recurrent mandibular amel...
   Price 12.50 €
• Value of the preservation...
   Price 14.00 €
• The tensegrity concept ap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic recognition of e...
   Price 8.50 €
• Assumptions in surgical t...
   Price 8.50 €
• Orbital decompression in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Periphery, central and ps...
   Price 10.50 €
• Smile "forced" smile vers...
   Price 10.50 €
• The use of ultrasound eva...
   Price 8.50 €
• The ultra-rapid cinematog...
   Price 10.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Malt lymphoma of the orbi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Focus on the BPPV: Semont...
   Price 12.50 €
• Acquired non tumoral lary...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cerebro-spinal fluid otor...
   Price 5.50 €
• Immunohistochemistry expr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Neuroplasticity in the au...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Can homograft ossicles st...
   Price 5.50 €
• Subacute tuberculous otit...
   Price 8.50 €
• The Voice Handicap Index:...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tonsillitis tuberculous s...
   Price 8.50 €
• Combined approach (extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Chondrocalcinosis of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Voice handicap evaluation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Decompression surgery for...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Head and neck reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Temporomandibular dysfunc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Validation of a self-asse...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 363.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2012 o

PHONIATRICS

Prosodic features of computer-assisted presentations: A preliminary study


Authors : Robieux C, Révis J, Ghio A, Giovanni A. (Marseille, Aix en Provence)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,1:3-8.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Computer-assisted presentations (CAP) seem to be characterized by changes of rhythm and melody of speech, compared to spontaneous speech, in many cases with periods with rapid and excessively regular breaks interspersed with long pauses. Methods: We analyzed the prosody and especially the pace in the temporal organization of prominences (distribution of stress, articulatory speed, pause duration) in 37 inexperienced subjects in a CAP corresponding to an actual review of graduation. The results were compared with a presen­ta­tion without support (PWS) conducted immediately after the first. A jury had to propose a gradation of prosody (typical CAP, intermediate, non-typical). Accentual distribution was analyzed from a perceptual experiment. The articulatory speed and length of breaks were analyzed from the speech signal. Results: We found the main elements of prosodic style assumed in three-quarters of subjects. This style was characterized by a faster articulatory rate and a more regular and rhythmic breaks due to excessive elongation of silent pauses when changing view of the slide. Discussion: The assumption seems validated because the majority of subjects in our study are of particular prosodic rhythm (faster and more regular). Subjects with arche­typal prosody of CAP appear to be those whose speech follo­wed closely their slide presentation, which disrupted their com­mu­nication.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE