Home Your basket
• Clinical and histopatholo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cochlear implants in chil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usher type I syndrome in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Smile "forced" smile vers...
   Price 10.50 €
• Disorders of the sense of...
   Price 5.50 €
• Intra-orbital infected cy...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Characteristics of the ma...
   Price 12.50 €
• Observational study to as...
   Price 14.00 €
• Sentinel lymph node biops...
   Price 10.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Is HIV/AIDS an independen...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bullet in the pharynx: En...
   Price 10.50 €
• Merkel cell carcinoma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Parathyroid cervical haem...
   Price 8.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma com...
   Price 5.50 €
• Surgery of the semicircul...
   Price 12.50 €
• Difficult blepharoplastie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.00 €
• A report of two cases of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Benign tumors of the nasa...
   Price 14.00 €
• Side-to-end hypoglossal-f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing disorders at the ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Voice prostheses: long-te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post operative Caldwell-L...
   Price 10.00 €
• Unsteadiness and drunkenn...
   Price 10.50 €
• A single appointment with...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vertigo: progress and pra...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sacrifice was an art: The...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prospective study on 43 s...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial paralysis: Functio...
   Price 10.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Long term results of KTP ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Attention deficit disorde...
   Price 10.50 €
• Develop­ment of an osteos...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 334.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2005 o

SPEECH THERAPY

Perceptual evaluation of substitution voices: The I(I) NFVo rating scale


Authors : M. Moerman, J. P. Martens, L. Crevier-Buchman, V. Woisard, P. Dejonckere (Lyon)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,5:323-325.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: Evaluation of a perceptual specific rating scale for specific severe non laryngeral dysphonia. Material and method: 113 speech samples from substitution voices were scored perceptually according to the IINFVo scale: overall quality impression (I), impression of Intelligibility (I), additive and unnecessary noise (N), speech fluency (F) and presence of voiced segments (Vo). Each parameter was scored on a visual analogue scale from 0 (minimally deviant) to 10 (maximally deviant substitution voicing). These samples were presented to semi-professional jury-members (second grade speech therapy students) and professional jury-members (phoniatricians and speech therapists, specialised in the oncological field). Results: Interindividual agreement between semi-professionals was moderate (0.57-0.68). Interindividual agreement between professionals was higher (0.82-0.86). These figures are similar or even better compared to the classical perceptual evaluation scale for laryngeal speech (GRBAS). Conclusion: Our study suggests that the I(I)NFVo rating scale is suitable for perceptual evaluation of substitution voicing and consistency results are comparable with the classical perceptual rating scale (GRBAS).

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE