Home Your basket
• Functional comparison of ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Medicamentous toxic heari...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal sarcoidosis: Ca...
   Price 5.50 €
• Complete branchial cleft ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Primary nasal tuberculosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• The verrucous laryngeal c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesterol granuloma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interstitial brachytherap...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evolution of the otology ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chondrocalcinosis of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The outcome of treatments...
   Price 10.50 €
• A clinical respiratory ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rare benin tumors of the ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pyogenic granuloma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• A histopathologic evaluat...
   Price 8.50 €
• Migrant foreign body of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical management of pa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Retrosigmoid vestibular n...
   Price 5.50 €
• Disability in patients wi...
   Price 10.50 €
• CT scan, MR imaging and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Implication of mitochondr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic augmentation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Life after total laryngec...
   Price 8.50 €
• Choanal atresia: therapeu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Smile "forced" smile vers...
   Price 10.50 €
• The prevention of voice d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diffuse cervical cellulit...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• Overlay versus underlay t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 296.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2002 o

AUDIOLOGY

Usefulness and limitations of speech audiometric testing in the detection of professional nose-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting.


Authors : E. Babin, A. Bequignon, M. Goullet de Rugy, E. Edy, S. Moreau, J. P. Izard, A. Valdazo (Caen)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,4:213-217.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: the objective of this study is the evaluation of the calculation of 100% intelligibility threshold and noise resistance index as a monitoring test in populations exposed to noise in their work environment. Method: this is a retrospective exposed-unexposed study as the exposure to the risk factors took place before the survey. The exposed subjects were chosen in principle on sonometric criteria and the unexposed subjects among employees whom we believe were not exposed. The exploration method included history taking, clinical examination, free field audiometry and speech audiometry with background noise. Results: the exposed population has a 100% intelligibility threshold on average equal to 29.69 dB, significantly higher than in the unexposed population where it is calculated at 25.30 dB (p=0.07). The noise resistance index varies with age (p=0.04). Conclusion: our study shows the existence of a significant hearing difference between two populations with different noise exposure. It demonstrates a relationship between a hearing loss risk factor such as noise and the occurrence of the "professional hearing loss" disorder. The calculation of the 100% intelligibility index and the noise resistance index advantageously complements tonal audiometry. These procedures provide a better approach to the social impact of hearing loss but were not useful in the detection of hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE