Home Your basket
• Surgery of mucocele of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma and...
   Price 5.50 €
• A study of peristomal rec...
   Price 5.50 €
• Is it possible to evolve ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Audiological comparison b...
   Price 14.00 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Intranasal surgery: the r...
   Price 5.50 €
• Far-advanced otosclerosis...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid...
   Price 10.50 €
• Feasibility study of sept...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical Practice Guideli...
   Price 12.00 €
• Simple management of the ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Vertical extended hemi cr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Partial hearing recovery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The effects of passive sm...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interest of peri-operativ...
   Price 10.50 €
• IPSEN Foundation meeting:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mandibular reconstruction...
   Price 8.50 €
• Aesthetic parotidectomy: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Persistent stapedial arte...
   Price 5.50 €
• Case report on a nasal gl...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparative results of ty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution of clinical ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Arteriovenous haemangioma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Morbidity of neck dissect...
   Price 15.00 €
• Laryngeal pemphigus...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic melanoma to th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparative study using A...
   Price 10.50 €
• Why is allergic rhinitis ...
   Price 12.00 €
• A study of the effects of...
   Price 14.00 €
• Nystagmus and vibratory t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oncocytoma of the parotid...
   Price 8.50 €
• New indications for heari...
   Price 8.50 €
• Peritonsillar abscess: Is...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic study of sustain...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the handica...
   Price 10.50 €
• New potentialities of the...
   Price 12.50 €
• A histopathologic evaluat...
   Price 8.50 €
• Parry-Romberg syndrome as...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cerebro-spinal fluid otor...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 391.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2011 o

PHONIATRICS

Context influence on the perception of dysphonia: when the knowledge of the patient’s clinical state can modify the results of perceptual voice quality assess­ment


Authors : Ghio A, Merienne S, Giovanni A. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,1:9-17.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Two experiments were conducted to examine how knowledge of the patient’s clinical state affects the results of perceptual voice quality assessment performed by specialists in voice therapy. This study involved 53 patients with a dysphonia. For each speaker, we selected a pair of recordings made in different circumstances. These pairs of voices were presented to seven listeners (ENT surgeons or speech therapists). The task was to perceptually compare the severity of the dysphonia between the 2 recordings of the pair. Stimuli were presented first in a blind test, then several weeks later with accompanying information about the patient; in particular, whether the voice was pre- or post- treatment was explicitly specified. We balanced this artificial contextual information in order to (α) reinforce the blind judgment (for example, voices perceived as better in the blind test were indicated as post treatment); (β) be inconsistent (in a clinical point of view) compared to the blind test (for example, voices perceived as more disordered during the blind test were indicated as post treatment). Results revealed that in the clinical-consistent context α, the preference was amplified in a significant way. In clinical-inconsistent condition β, we observed an inhibition effect or a change of decision. In this condi­tion, the judgment was more dependant on the contextual information (pre/post treatment) than on the auditory sensation obtained in blind condition. These findings are discussed with reference to results in the literature on visual, olfactory or audi­tory perception in context. In the frame of perceptual voice assess­ment, results revealed that only blind tests can provide reliable results.


Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE