Home Your basket
• Otomycosis: Clinical and ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Liposarcoma of the hypoph...
   Price 5.50 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A non-linear model of lar...
   Price 10.50 €
• Understanding the use of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Role of [18]-FDG PET/CT i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Traditional and emerging ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Relation between actinomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post operative Caldwell-L...
   Price 10.00 €
• Validity of cervical ausc...
   Price 12.00 €
• Solitary myofibroma of th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesteatoma behind a no...
   Price 10.50 €
• Airbag and hearing loss: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Extramuscular soft tissue...
   Price 8.50 €
• Enlarged marginal incisio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Peptide receptor radionuc...
   Price 14.00 €
• Fistulisation of a tuberc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Abscess tonsillectomy for...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the eth...
   Price 8.50 €
• Static management of lago...
   Price 10.50 €
• Navigation in head and ne...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otogenic pneumocephalus: ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation of the use of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perilymphatic Gusher as a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Functional anatomy of the...
   Price 14.00 €
• Pulsatile tinnitus and ve...
   Price 8.50 €
• The role of larynx kinest...
   Price 10.50 €
• Importance of swallowing ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Assumptions in surgical t...
   Price 8.50 €
• The relationship between ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgery of the semicircul...
   Price 12.50 €

Total Order 332.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2002 o

LARYNGOLOGY

The value of the operating video-fiberoscope in the assessment of the head and neck carcinoma.


Authors : M. Folia, V. Woisard, E. Uro-Coste, E. Serrano, J. J. Pessey (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,3:163-170.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: the aim of our study was to evaluate the video fiberoscope with operator canal (FOC) in the diagnosis of head and neck carcinoma compared to direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methodology: from August 2000 to May 2001, 82 patients were included in a prospective study. They were examined for pharyngolaryngeal cancer with the FOC, DL and a CAT-SCAN. The compared elements were the visualization of the different regions of the pharyngolarynx. A three dimensional description of the lesion, the presence of secondary localisations as well as the anatomo pathological results were obtained with FOC and DL. Results: although the pharyngolarynx is less well visualized in FOC than in DL (p = 0.04), no statistically significant difference was found between the two methods in terms of visual diagnosis and assessment of the extent of the lesion. The sensitivity of the biopsies made with FOC is lower than those performed with DL (66% FOC, 97% DL). Moreover, we have noted that FOC is highly reliant on the experience and ability of the surgeon. Conclusion: DL remains the most reliable technique for the exploration and diagnosis of the pharyngolarynx . If it is not possible to perform a DL or if it is not indicated (trismus, contra-indication to general anaesthesia) FOC should be considered as the examination of choice.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE