Home Your basket
• Reinforcing tympanoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Implication of mitochondr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Blepharoplasty and upper ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Choanal atresia : a retro...
   Price 8.50 €
• New trends in rhinoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partiturogram: (New) tool...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early education for child...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the handica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vestibular neuritis: aeti...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of swallowing ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Malignant mixed tumor of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Oropharyngeal reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• The subjective visual ver...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution of endoscopi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cine-MRI contribution to ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• Acute acoustic trauma, a ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Alternative clinical mana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 8.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Isolated tracheo-œsophage...
   Price 5.50 €
• Fistulisation of a tuberc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Reconstruction after tumo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post-operative evaluation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Complicated fungal sinusi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of cervical ce...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side effects and patients...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otolaryngological aspects...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 297.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2007 o

PHONIATRICS

Evolution of voice assessment and quality of life after endoscopic laser cordectomy


Authors : Crevier-Buchman L, Colomb I, Hans S, Vaissière J, Brasnu D. (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2007;128,5:315-320.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: Endoscopic laser cordectomy is a minimally invasive surgical technique for Tis, T1 and selected T2 glottic carcinoma. The purpose of the study was to evaluate prospectively pre-operatively and 3 months after surgery i) acoustic and perceptual parameters, ii) quality of life through a self evaluation (VHI) test. Methods: A prospective longitudinal evaluation of 13 male patients, shared-out onto 3 surgical procedures (cordectomy type I, grouped type II and III, and type V). Patients were recorded before and at 1 and 3 months after surgery. The parameters recorded were; acoustic parameters (F0, Jitter, Shimmer), Maximum Phonation Time (MPT), perceptual evaluation using the GRBAS scale and the self evaluation scale with the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Results: No statistics could be done because of the limited number of patients in each group. Perceptual and self evaluation data showed a favorable progression between 1 and 3 months for patients in group Type I, II and III cordectomy. Evolution of acoustic parameters is more difficult to analyze. The voice of the Cordectomy type V group remains whispery at 3 months after surgery. Conclusion: The quality of voice is a very important criterion for the patients. During the first 3 months after laser cordectomy, the perceptual vocal function and the self evaluation improves. But for the acoustic data, 3 months is probably too short to objectively quantify an improvement especially after type V cordectomy.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE