Home Your basket
• Reinforcing tympanoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Implication of mitochondr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Blepharoplasty and upper ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Choanal atresia : a retro...
   Price 8.50 €
• New trends in rhinoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partiturogram: (New) tool...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early education for child...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the handica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vestibular neuritis: aeti...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of swallowing ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Malignant mixed tumor of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Oropharyngeal reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• The subjective visual ver...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution of endoscopi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cine-MRI contribution to ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• Acute acoustic trauma, a ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Alternative clinical mana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 8.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Isolated tracheo-œsophage...
   Price 5.50 €
• Fistulisation of a tuberc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Reconstruction after tumo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post-operative evaluation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Complicated fungal sinusi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of cervical ce...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side effects and patients...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otolaryngological aspects...
   Price 8.50 €
• Desmoplastic ameloblastom...
   Price 5.50 €
• Similarities between reti...
   Price 14.00 €
• Unilateral laryngeal para...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dysphagia, a geriatric po...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cochlear implant in elder...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of rhinologic ...
   Price 10.50 €
• An important procedure in...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 365.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2013 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

Aesthetic augmentation of the dorsum, mid-term results


Authors : Winter C, Gerbault O, Kestemont P, Castillo L. (Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,4:179-184.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Purpose of the study: Dorsum aesthetic augmentation can be divided according to their objective, total and partial increa­se or camouflage. The objective of this original article is to define the valid techniques in each indication through a cohort study, clinical cases, and current data from the lite­ra­ture. Patient and method: lt is a monocentric mono operator retrospec­tive study from 2005 to 2010 included. On 171 rhino­plasties, 57 were augmentation rhinoplasties of which 40 were of interest to the dorsum. Excluded patients were bone grafts, lost and one patient operated on a active Wegener desease. Thus 26 rhinoplasties were analyzed by an indepen­dent obser­ver. Results: All grafts confused there were 11.5% of resorption which corresponds to the data from the literature, 17% of resorption in the camouflage indications and 7% in augmen­ta­tion, as well as a higher resorption for crushed cartilage (33%) rate. There was more mobility in augmentation (28%) than in the camouflage (8%) and greater visibility of the banks of the graft in augmentation (35%) compared to the camouflage (8%). Conclusion: In the mild to severe saddle nose, the DCF is greater than cartilage monobloc or crushed in terms of stability and visibility, its indications could be expanded to harmoni­sa­tion. Camouflage crushed cartilage is not sustainable and the temporal aponeurosis could it be preferred. Resorbable fillers can offer an alternative to surgery or improve its results.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE