Home Your basket
• A simple assessment of qu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral latero-pontine ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Transit time of swallowin...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Prosody and reading: Temp...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cosmetic radiofrequency...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Morphodynami...
   Price 10.50 €
• Study of the supra-glotti...
   Price 10.50 €
• The silent sinus syndrome...
   Price 12.50 €
• Epitympanic osteoma of th...
   Price 12.50 €
• The cholesteatomatous rin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Botulinum toxin and rejuv...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial threads for face l...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side effects and patients...
   Price 10.50 €
• Apology for the biplane c...
   Price 10.50 €
• The nasal framework in rh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Somatic tinnitus (review)...
   Price 12.50 €
• Pharyngeal pouch surgery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pneumoparotid: a case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Progressive cochleo-vesti...
   Price 5.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of MIBI scintigr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of a huge amel...
   Price 5.50 €
• Use of instrumental vocal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic scale for eval...
   Price 8.50 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €

Total Order 246.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2013 o

PHONIATRICS

From intelligibility to comprehension, which measure­ment in practice?


Authors : Woisard V, Espesser R, Ghio A, Duez D. (Toulouse, Aix en Provence)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,1:27-33.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : The modelling of the tests assessing speech disorders in touch with the international classification of the functioning implies a reflection on measurement tools. The access to the sense of the message from decoding of the signal to the action infers at the interlocutor's justifies various methods. The objec­tive of this work is to demonstrate the limit of the usual tests of intelligibility. Material and method: A population of 10 sub­jects presenting a speech disorder secondary to a Head and Neck cancer and 2 subjects controls recorded a corpus of 80 sylla­bles developed with the most frequent 16 French consonants and 5 vowels. The test of intelligibility consisted of a task of identification of consonants by a jury of 11 listeners. Results: About is the method used to estimate the informative value of the consonants tested, the uvular consonant /r/ and the nasal /n/, /m/ are very well perceived. The weighting by the rate of confusion makes tipped over the position of labio­dentales /f/, /v/ and that of / p/. The just perception of the sound /p/ would be underestimated while sounds /v/ and /f/ would be overestimated. Sounds /g/, /k/, /j/ remain the least well received. This obser­va­tion results probably from the profile of distortions produced by the selection of the population and probably from the frequency of the syllables containing these consonants in the french language for the sample of the corpus. Conclusion: The rate of confusion appears as a funda­mental element, inciting to look for more relevant methods of analysis of the results of the tests of intelligibility.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE