Home Your basket
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparison of stapes prot...
   Price 15.00 €
• Carcinogenesis of the eth...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannoma of the tongue:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral vestibular loss...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparative study using A...
   Price 10.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma and...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interventional phoniatry...
   Price 14.00 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• The symphonix symposium u...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing preservation in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cowden syndrome: Otolaryn...
   Price 12.00 €
• Bilateral cleft lip and c...
   Price 14.00 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical treatement by in...
   Price 12.50 €
• Social consequence of a d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital anomalies of n...
   Price 14.00 €
• A remnant tooth in an ede...
   Price 8.50 €
• Merkel cell carcinoma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.50 €
• Synovial sarcoma of the h...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chronic laryngitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Disability in patients wi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Transsexuality: Speech th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction of bone de...
   Price 10.50 €
• The ultra-low resistance ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical cystic lymphangi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Radiofrequency inferior t...
   Price 14.00 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 360.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2018 o

HEAD AND NECK

How to predict post thyroi­dec­tomy hypo­calcaemia with early PTH assay? A prospective study


Authors : Hervochon R. (Saint Germain en Laye)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2018;139,2:27-31.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Aim: The aim of this study was to assess early post operative Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) assay as a predictor of day-one hypocalcaemia after total thyroidectomy. Material and Methods: Post-operative PTH assays were performed 1 hour (PTHh1) and 4 hours (PTHh4) after thyroid removal. Day-one hypo­calcaemia was defined as having corrected total serum calcium lower than 2.0 mmol/l. We calculated R-ratio: Post operative PTH/preoperative PTH and used ROC-curves. Objectives: The objective was to define the best predictive factor of day-one hypocalcaemia. Results: Ten of 109 patients presented hypocalcaemia at day-one (9.2%). Area under ROC-curves for PTHh1, PTHh4, R-PTHh1 and R-PTHh4 did not signi­­ficantly differ (0.81; 0.80; 0.78 and 0.79; p >0.05). Thresholds were respectively: 19.5 mmol/l, 13.5 mmol/l, 0.38, and 0.37. All tests had sensitivities of 100%. Greatest Positive Predictive Value was 28% for PTHh4, versus 21% for the others. Patients with PTHh4 <13.5 mmol/l belonged to a «high risk of hypocalcaemia» group, whose corrected total serum calcium kinetics was decreasing the days after, contrary to other patients. Conclusion: Our results did not demonstrate any benefit in measuring a pre-operative PTH to detect post-operative hypocalcaemia. A single PTH assay sampled at h4 with a threshold of 13.5 ng/L seems to be the best and reliable tool.

Price : 12.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE