Home Your basket
• Advantages of combined th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic anatomy of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Apology for the biplane c...
   Price 10.50 €
• Gastro-oesophageal reflux...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal involvement in Croh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Lysis of the incus long p...
   Price 10.50 €
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €
• Middle ear tuberculosis e...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chondrosarcoma of the hyo...
   Price 12.50 €
• Salvage composite resecti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Dysphonia in children: Re...
   Price 12.50 €
• Pneumatization (concha bu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Farber's disease: a cause...
   Price 5.50 €
• Post-operative evaluation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the laryn...
   Price 5.50 €
• The effect of the speaker...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paediatric airway endosco...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vocal rehabilitation with...
   Price 10.50 €
• A specific plain X-ray in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparative results of ty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Objective tinnitus and es...
   Price 5.50 €
• From intelligibility to c...
   Price 10.50 €
• The place of speech thera...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prognostic value of mandi...
   Price 10.50 €
• A new case of osseointegr...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A simple assessment of qu...
   Price 10.50 €
• The symphonix symposium u...
   Price 8.50 €
• The infrahyoid musculocut...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recovery of saccular func...
   Price 8.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endoscopic sphenoid proce...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adult laryngeal cavernous...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Airbag and hearing loss: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endoscopic scale for eval...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vocal and behavioral adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment of acute mastoi...
   Price 8.50 €
• The verrucous laryngeal c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Anatomic evaluation of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• The relevance of Choukrou...
   Price 10.50 €
• Personality study in prof...
   Price 5.50 €
• Validity of cervical ausc...
   Price 12.00 €
• Scaling properties of the...
   Price 5.50 €
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Setting up a «Bonebridge»...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal tumours of the thre...
   Price 10.50 €
• Polypose nasosinusienne a...
   Price 15.00 €
• Petrosal presigmoid appro...
   Price 8.50 €
• Fronto-ethmoidal fibrous ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vibration induced nystagm...
   Price 10.50 €
• Carcinogenesis of the eth...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical exploration of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Outcome of surgical and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinico-radiological cons...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervicofacial cellulitise...
   Price 10.50 €
• The relationship between ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Surgical management of pa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cytokines profile in cyst...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fungal infections of para...
   Price 8.50 €
• Late metastasis from rena...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bilateral vestibular loss...
   Price 10.50 €
• A protocol for the evalua...
   Price 8.50 €
• Choanal atresia: therapeu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution to anatomica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of peritonsill...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• One-stage surgery of midd...
   Price 8.50 €
• A case of nasal foreign b...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of labial inco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otoplasty for prominent e...
   Price 8.50 €
• Results of fine needle as...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervico facial lymphangio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Atelectasis of the maxill...
   Price 8.50 €
• The subjective visual ver...
   Price 10.50 €
• Functional comparison of ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Major orbital complicatio...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 731.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2004 o

AUDIOLOGY

The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss


Authors : M. A. Kiliç, F. Ögüt (Izmir)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,1:35-38.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: to determine whether speaker gender affects speech discrimination scores, in normal hearing and simulated high frequency hearing loss situations. Materials and Methods: listeners were twenty normal volunteers. The speech stimuli were eight phonetically balanced monosyllabic word lists, uttered by a male and a female speakers. These lists were low-pass filtered at 1500, 2500 and 3500 Hz’s to represent high frequency hearing loss. To obtain speech discrimination scores, the subjects listened to each of the eight lists in a different filtering and talker conditions in a randomized order. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Results: in normal hearing situation, the scores obtained by male and female speeches, were similar (p=0.60). On the contrary, statistically significant differences were observed in all of the three high frequency hearing loss situations (p<0.01). Conclusion: Female speech is significantly more difficult to discriminate than male speech in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss and probably in patients with high frequency hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE