Home Your basket
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparison of stapes prot...
   Price 15.00 €
• Carcinogenesis of the eth...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannoma of the tongue:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral vestibular loss...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparative study using A...
   Price 10.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma and...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interventional phoniatry...
   Price 14.00 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• The symphonix symposium u...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing preservation in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cowden syndrome: Otolaryn...
   Price 12.00 €
• Bilateral cleft lip and c...
   Price 14.00 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical treatement by in...
   Price 12.50 €
• Social consequence of a d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital anomalies of n...
   Price 14.00 €
• A remnant tooth in an ede...
   Price 8.50 €
• Merkel cell carcinoma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.50 €
• Synovial sarcoma of the h...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chronic laryngitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Disability in patients wi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Transsexuality: Speech th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction of bone de...
   Price 10.50 €
• The ultra-low resistance ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical cystic lymphangi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Radiofrequency inferior t...
   Price 14.00 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prosodic features of comp...
   Price 10.50 €
• The silent sinus syndrome...
   Price 12.50 €

Total Order 394.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2014 o

SWALLOWING

Validity of cervical auscultation in the screening for aspiration


Authors : Al Hawat A, Woisard V, Perez-Begout L, Sarrabère E, Grand S, Puech M. (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2014;135,2:51-56.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Introduction: Cervical auscultation could improve the performance of bedside swallowing test to predict aspiration, especially silent aspiration. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive values of bedside swallowing test performed with and without cervical auscultation by logopedist students who had intensive training on cervical auscultation. Materials and methods: 64 patients were included in the study. They all underwent swallowing test alone, combined swallowing test and cervical auscultation, and videofluoroscopic swallowing study as defined gold standard. Two logopedist students, at the end of their training, performed the auscultation and noted their results. Results: 128 tests were performed, 96% of the tests were judged positive for aspiration. When comparing the results of the two different clinical tests, the detection of clinical signs is not improved by the addition of auscultation. Using a penetration aspiration scale threshold >5, the area under the curve measured for the swallowing test alone was significantly higher than that measured for the combined tests (p= 0.03) (0.66 for the swallowing test alone (95% CI between 0.49 and 0.83), and 0.50 for the combined tests (95% CI between 0.31 and 0.69). Conclusion: This study showed no advantage in performing cervical auscultation with bedside swallowing test. Cervical auscultation seems to hamper the assessment, mainly the perception of wet voice and laryngeal motion. These results are compatible with literature but need further confirmation using studies performed with trained logopedists.


Price : 12.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE