Home Your basket
• Laryngeal pemphigus...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatment of children wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• The effectiveness of voic...
   Price 14.00 €
• Evaluation of the handica...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of laryngeal sialo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Results of fine needle as...
   Price 10.50 €
• Proposal of a rating scal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Defects in accuracy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Local anesthesia for coch...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgery of the semicircul...
   Price 12.50 €
• Vocal forcing and posture...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early education for child...
   Price 10.50 €
• Velo-pharyngeal incompete...
   Price 14.00 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Botulinum toxin in the lo...
   Price 14.00 €
• The place of the myocutan...
   Price 10.50 €
• A protocol for the evalua...
   Price 8.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Transit time of swallowin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recovery of saccular func...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical management of ma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Social consequence of a d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Overlay versus underlay t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve sc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recent advances in surger...
   Price 5.50 €
• Role of diffusion weighte...
   Price 10.50 €
• These lesions of the voca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Is ethmoidal adenocarcino...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparative study using A...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic sphenoid proce...
   Price 8.50 €
• Ethmoid-nasal meningioma ...
   Price 10.00 €
• Art and nose....
   Price 8.50 €
• Rehabilitation strategies...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Subcutaneous emphysema an...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interest of the chest CT ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the primary...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral paranasal sinus...
   Price 8.50 €
• Objective tinnitus and es...
   Price 5.50 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Exophthalmos arising from...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recurrent mandibular amel...
   Price 12.50 €
• New trends in rhinoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution of endoscopi...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 459.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2014 o

SWALLOWING

Validity of cervical auscultation in the screening for aspiration


Authors : Al Hawat A, Woisard V, Perez-Begout L, Sarrabère E, Grand S, Puech M. (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2014;135,2:51-56.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Introduction: Cervical auscultation could improve the performance of bedside swallowing test to predict aspiration, especially silent aspiration. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive values of bedside swallowing test performed with and without cervical auscultation by logopedist students who had intensive training on cervical auscultation. Materials and methods: 64 patients were included in the study. They all underwent swallowing test alone, combined swallowing test and cervical auscultation, and videofluoroscopic swallowing study as defined gold standard. Two logopedist students, at the end of their training, performed the auscultation and noted their results. Results: 128 tests were performed, 96% of the tests were judged positive for aspiration. When comparing the results of the two different clinical tests, the detection of clinical signs is not improved by the addition of auscultation. Using a penetration aspiration scale threshold >5, the area under the curve measured for the swallowing test alone was significantly higher than that measured for the combined tests (p= 0.03) (0.66 for the swallowing test alone (95% CI between 0.49 and 0.83), and 0.50 for the combined tests (95% CI between 0.31 and 0.69). Conclusion: This study showed no advantage in performing cervical auscultation with bedside swallowing test. Cervical auscultation seems to hamper the assessment, mainly the perception of wet voice and laryngeal motion. These results are compatible with literature but need further confirmation using studies performed with trained logopedists.


Price : 12.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE