Home Your basket
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• The Voice Handicap Index:...
   Price 10.50 €
• Long term results of tymp...
   Price 5.50 €
• Central and peripherical ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Clinical signs and correl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Efficacy and safety of mo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Retrosigmoid vestibular n...
   Price 5.50 €
• Study of the platysma col...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid differenciated ca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multidisciplinary daytime...
   Price 12.00 €
• Endoscopic-assisted retro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Validation of a self asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Giant osteoma of the maxi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Paediatric airway endosco...
   Price 5.50 €
• Use of a laryngeal mask d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pulsatile tinnitus and ve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• A simple assessment of qu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Supra and infra hyoid mid...
   Price 10.50 €
• Genotype – phenotype corr...
   Price 8.50 €
• Artistic anatomy of the n...
   Price 8.50 €
• The emergency in the mana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Migraine, neurone and ves...
   Price 5.50 €
• Partial hearing recovery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vocal fold structure and ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Augmentation of the abdom...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparative study using A...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unilateral endolymphatic ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Advantages of combined th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 299.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2011 o

PHONIATRICS

Perceptual assessment of dysphonia: a training protocol with natural speech


Authors : Ghio A, Dufour S, Rouaze M, Bokanowski V, Pouchoulin G, Révis J, Giovanni A. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,1:19-27.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: In this study, we proposed and tested the effectiveness of a training procedure on perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. Participants were naive listeners who learned to judge the severity of vocal disorders. Materials and methods: The corpus consisted of 142 female voices ranging from normal to severely dysphonic voices. A total of 38 naive listeners were tested, and the experiment was divided in 3 phases: (1) A pretest to assess the level of our listeners in the categorization of dys­pho­nia, (2) the training phase and (3) a post-test to assess the improvement associated with the training. To examine the persistence of the training, the post-test was administrated twice: Immediately after the training session and one week later. Results: Improvement in the performance between the pretest and the post-test was found for moderate and severe dysphonia. No improvement was observed in the categorization of slightly dysphonic voices, which seem the more resistant to learning. Normal voices also showed no improvement, which is likely due to the high performance on these voices during the pre-test. The improvement observed in the categorization of moderate and severe dysphonia was still present even one week after the training. Discussion: The protocol tested in this study appears to be effective and could constitute an element of training courses for speech and voice therapists. The perception of the inter­mediate levels of dysphonia, however, remains difficult to quantify and needs to be improved.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE