Home Your basket
• Cytokines profile in cyst...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• A non-linear model of lar...
   Price 10.50 €
• Blepharoplasty and upper ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interventional phoniatry...
   Price 14.00 €
• Is ethmoidal adenocarcino...
   Price 10.50 €
• Long term results of KTP ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Melanotic neuroectodermal...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Clinico-radiological cons...
   Price 10.50 €
• A specific plain X-ray in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing preservation in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acquired non tumoral lary...
   Price 12.00 €
• Karapandzic flap for reco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign tumors of the nasa...
   Price 14.00 €
• Is HIV/AIDS an independen...
   Price 10.50 €
• Human skull development a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Importance of a molding n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Chondrocalcinosis of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Toxic nodular goitre asso...
   Price 5.50 €
• Functional anatomy of the...
   Price 14.00 €
• Parathyroïd adenoma induc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Acinic cell carcinoma in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal tracheal post-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Scaling properties of the...
   Price 5.50 €
• Social consequence of a d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Intra oral approach versu...
   Price 12.00 €
• Voice after supracricoid ...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 300.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2013 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

Smile "forced" smile versus "spontaneous": Compa­ri­son of 3 techniques of reconstructive surgery of the face. Myoplasty temporal muscle, hypoglossal facial anastomosis and gracilis muscle free flap


Authors : Lheureux-Portmann A, Lapalus-Curtoud Q, Robert M, Tankéré F, Disant F, Pasche Ph, Lamas G, Gatignol P. (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,5:267-276.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : The facial palsy cause serious consequences for patients. Studies have also shown that in these patients, the inability to produce an appropriate and spontaneous smile would be a key factor of depression [1, 2]. When facial palsy is considered complete and the nerve cannot be repaired, the patient can benefit from palliative surgery to regain a better quality of life in the aesthetic, functional, and psychological aspects. The hypoglossal-facial anastomosis (AHF), temporal myoplasty (MAT) and gracilis transposition (TG) are the major surgeries currently used for this purpose. The aim of our study is to assess quantitatively and qualitatively the effects of each of these surgeries on the lip mobility and production of smile. From this perspective, we proposed a protocol of an evaluation of facial motricity, of quality of life, and more particularly on the quality and the analysis of the smile. The results underline that there is no significant difference in the recovery of the facial motricity according to the surgery. Only the slower, deferred deadline of recovery at the patients AHF and TG who have to wait several months, it is for the same levels as that of the patients’ MAT. A premature and intensive rehabilitation such as the patients of our protocol benefited from it what is nevertheless essential to a good recovery whatever is the surgery.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE