Home Your basket
• Vestibular neuritis: aeti...
   Price 8.50 €
• Temporary loss of visual ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Salivary gland choristoma...
   Price 5.50 €
• Post intubation collected...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bilateral paranasal sinus...
   Price 8.50 €
• Oncocytoma of the parotid...
   Price 8.50 €
• Mastoid eosinophilic gran...
   Price 5.50 €
• Reverse phonation: Pathol...
   Price 8.50 €
• An original case of laryn...
   Price 8.50 €
• Protruding ears...
   Price 8.50 €
• Posterior cranial fossa a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Preliminary experimental ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cat scratch disease: A di...
   Price 8.50 €
• Glomangioma or "glomic tu...
   Price 5.50 €
• Implementation of the Eur...
   Price 10.50 €
• The value of fine-needle ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Use of instrumental vocal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ossiculoplasty with hydro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Epitympanic osteoma of th...
   Price 12.50 €
• Ganglioneuroma in saharan...
   Price 10.00 €
• Allergic and pneumologic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Predictive factors for re...
   Price 14.00 €
• Surgical exploration of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €

Total Order 248.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2003 o

PHONIATRICS

Implementation of the European Laryngological Society (ELS)- Basic protocol for assessing voice treatment effect


Authors : DeJonckere PH, Crevier-Buchman L, Marie JP, Moerman M, Remacle M, Woisard V. (European Research Group on the Larynx)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2003;124,5:279-283.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: 93 patients with various kinds of organic benign voice pathology (vocal fold nodules, polyp, Reinke’s oedema, unilateral paralysis, sulcus/scar) and/or with muscle tension dysphonia, were evaluated before and after their voice treatment (phonosurgery with voice therapy, antireflux medication, or voice therapy alone) in order to check the clinical relevance of a basic multidimensional protocol for assessing functional results of voice treatments, as developed by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the ELS. Materiel and method: The protocol has been used in different university voice clinics. It comprises 5 dimensions: Perception: Grade, Breathiness and Roughness from the GRBAS-scale, rated by two experienced judges: a phoniatrician/laryngologist and a speech therapist. Acoustics: Jitter % and Shimmer % computed on a /a:/, at comfortable loudness and pitch. Also Fo-range and softest possible intensity. Videostroboscopy: Glottal closure, regularity, mucosal wave and symmetry, rated separately. Phonation quotient: computed by dividing the vital capacity (ml) by the maximum phonation time (s) (best value of 2x3 trials). Self rating by the patient: voice quality in itself and general social/ occupational handicap due to the voice problem rated separately. Results: Results show that, at group level, the overall effects for each parameter indicate a significant improvement after treatment. However, the correlations between the pre/post changes for the different parameters are weak (low redundancy). Conclusion: The assessment of voice pathology needs to be multidimensional, as these multidimensional informations about voice changes lead to a better understanding of the actual way in which a treatment works.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE