Home Your basket
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• The ultra-low resistance ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervico facial lymphangio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Zenker’s diverticulum in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Modified butterfly cartil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Supra and infra hyoid mid...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adaptation and validation...
   Price 10.50 €
• The input of autogenous g...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recurrent mandibular amel...
   Price 12.50 €
• Kikuchi-Fujimoto’s diseas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Training strategies of th...
   Price 8.50 €
• Validation of a clinical ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Phonatory threshold press...
   Price 10.50 €
• Salivary gland choristoma...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Total pharyngolayngectomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid tuberculosis asso...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic medialization ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parapharyngeal tumours: M...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paraganglioma of the cere...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Early PTH assay after tot...
   Price 10.50 €
• Merkel cell carcinoma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Unilateral laryngeal para...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant schwa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ethmoidal metastasis reve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Inferior turbinate hypert...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinophyma in a black afr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Allergic and pneumologic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• An original case of laryn...
   Price 8.50 €
• Aspects of voice quality ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A giant lipoma of parapha...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 294.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2015 o

HEAD AND NECK CARCINOLOGY

Value of the preservation of an osseous mandibular rim with a fibula free flap reconstruction


Authors : Cortese S, Phulpin B, Mastronicola R, Gangloff P, Guillet J, Roch M, Julien L, Verhaeghe JL, Dolivet G. (Vandœuvre les Nancy)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2015;136,2:61-66.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Background: Reconstruction of the mandible with micro­vascularized fibula transplants is actually a well-established procedure, yet the major component is the limited diameter of the diaphysis that can induce oral rehabilitation’s failure, especially in dentate patients. In this paper, we report our surgi­cal procedure allowing preservation of the mandibular height. The primary objective was to assess aesthetic and func­tional improvements of preservation of an osseous mandibular rim with a fibula free flap reconstruction. Patients and methods: Five patients (all males, mean age of 60 years) were treated with this method. Aetiologies were tumour in 3 cases, and osteo­radionecrosis in the two others cases. We described all step of our surgical procedure and the functional, aesthetic and carcinologic results were evaluated. The follow up varies from 6 to 30 months. Results: One patient died at 12 days from unre­la­ted affection. For the other patients, both the aesthetics and functional outcomes were better than in case of mandibular interruption surgery. In fact, the mandibular contour of the mandibule was preserved and the height of mandible was restored. One patient is in progress of dental rehabilitation with osseous implants. Carcinologically, no local recurrence was observed. Conclusion: This technique is reliable and enables to optimize oral rehabilitation with endosteal implants. Nevertheless, we consider that the 3D scanner is essential before the intervention to evaluate the osseous reach. Moreover, if necessarily the procedure can be modified intraoperatively.

Price : 14.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE