Home Your basket
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tumours of the accessory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Intrapetrous cholesteatom...
   Price 10.50 €
• Is HIV/AIDS an independen...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otolaryngological aspects...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatments of hereditary ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ruptured pexis after supr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasosinusal tumours: Anat...
   Price 14.00 €
• Formant structures of vow...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post-traumatic otoscleros...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal septal abscess: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Autologous fat graft for ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of vocal abuse...
   Price 8.50 €
• The supracricoid laryngec...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid pseudo-nodules: 3...
   Price 5.50 €
• Parry-Romberg syndrome as...
   Price 12.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• Unilateral endolymphatic ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Combined approach (extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Atelectasis of the maxill...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Esthesioneuroblastoma....
   Price 5.50 €
• Temporary loss of visual ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Alternative clinical mana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Modified butterfly cartil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stuttering and Tourette’s...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 295.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2012 o

PHONIATRICS

Prosodic features of computer-assisted presentations: A preliminary study


Authors : Robieux C, Révis J, Ghio A, Giovanni A. (Marseille, Aix en Provence)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,1:3-8.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Computer-assisted presentations (CAP) seem to be characterized by changes of rhythm and melody of speech, compared to spontaneous speech, in many cases with periods with rapid and excessively regular breaks interspersed with long pauses. Methods: We analyzed the prosody and especially the pace in the temporal organization of prominences (distribution of stress, articulatory speed, pause duration) in 37 inexperienced subjects in a CAP corresponding to an actual review of graduation. The results were compared with a presen­ta­tion without support (PWS) conducted immediately after the first. A jury had to propose a gradation of prosody (typical CAP, intermediate, non-typical). Accentual distribution was analyzed from a perceptual experiment. The articulatory speed and length of breaks were analyzed from the speech signal. Results: We found the main elements of prosodic style assumed in three-quarters of subjects. This style was characterized by a faster articulatory rate and a more regular and rhythmic breaks due to excessive elongation of silent pauses when changing view of the slide. Discussion: The assumption seems validated because the majority of subjects in our study are of particular prosodic rhythm (faster and more regular). Subjects with arche­typal prosody of CAP appear to be those whose speech follo­wed closely their slide presentation, which disrupted their com­mu­nication.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE