Home Your basket
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pharyngolaryngectomy for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early education for child...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sphenochoanal polyp: Repo...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tuberculous otomastoiditi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervico facial lymphangio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral vestibular loss...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rare benin tumors of the ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal pemphigus...
   Price 5.50 €
• Different clinical approa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Parathyroïd adenoma induc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Carcinogenesis of the eth...
   Price 10.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma com...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesteatoma presenting ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Solitary myofibroma of th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cyst and fistu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of labial inco...
   Price 10.50 €
• A sphenoidal mucocele wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Is coincidence detection ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical liposuction: A r...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perceptual evaluation of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The monaural pseudo-stere...
   Price 8.50 €
• The subjective visual ver...
   Price 10.50 €
• Modified butterfly cartil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Communication disorders m...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prosodic analysis of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Focus on the BPPV: Semont...
   Price 12.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Therapeutic management of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Teeth and sinuses...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 306.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2013 o

PHONIATRICS

From intelligibility to comprehension, which measure­ment in practice?


Authors : Woisard V, Espesser R, Ghio A, Duez D. (Toulouse, Aix en Provence)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,1:27-33.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : The modelling of the tests assessing speech disorders in touch with the international classification of the functioning implies a reflection on measurement tools. The access to the sense of the message from decoding of the signal to the action infers at the interlocutor's justifies various methods. The objec­tive of this work is to demonstrate the limit of the usual tests of intelligibility. Material and method: A population of 10 sub­jects presenting a speech disorder secondary to a Head and Neck cancer and 2 subjects controls recorded a corpus of 80 sylla­bles developed with the most frequent 16 French consonants and 5 vowels. The test of intelligibility consisted of a task of identification of consonants by a jury of 11 listeners. Results: About is the method used to estimate the informative value of the consonants tested, the uvular consonant /r/ and the nasal /n/, /m/ are very well perceived. The weighting by the rate of confusion makes tipped over the position of labio­dentales /f/, /v/ and that of / p/. The just perception of the sound /p/ would be underestimated while sounds /v/ and /f/ would be overestimated. Sounds /g/, /k/, /j/ remain the least well received. This obser­va­tion results probably from the profile of distortions produced by the selection of the population and probably from the frequency of the syllables containing these consonants in the french language for the sample of the corpus. Conclusion: The rate of confusion appears as a funda­mental element, inciting to look for more relevant methods of analysis of the results of the tests of intelligibility.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE